[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Nasty Cheerleading in favor of R36F

To: "CQ-Contest" <CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Nasty Cheerleading in favor of R36F
From: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 19:48:58 -0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I didn't miss the point.  I just don't share your conclusion.

Just to set my position:  I believe that ANY spotting is too much, but the 
charge of "cheerleading" seems misplaced in this case.

"Cheerleaders" typically spot their "friend" almost exclusively, but both 
the accused here (UA9's) also spotted pretty much every other R3 that was 

My guess is that proximity is the explanation in this case, not some 
nefarious scheme as LU5DX proposes.

73, de Hans, K0HB
"Just a boy and his radio"
Proud Member of:
 A1 Operators - http://www.arrl.org/a-1-op
 MWA - http://www.W0AA.org
 TCDXA - http://www.tcdxa.org
 CADXA - http://www.cadxa.org
 LVDXA - http://www.lvdxa.org
 CWOps - http://www.cwops.org
 SOC - http://www.qsl.net/soc
 TCFMC - http://tcfmc.org
Sea stories here ---> http://k0hb.spaces.live.com/
Request QSL at  ---> http://www.clublog.org/logsearch/K0HB
All valid QSL requests honored with old fashioned paper QSL!
LoTW participant

>> I'm guessing that the fourteen "1's" are busted calls.
> Once again, you've missed the point.  One WRTC station
> had some 75 spots more than the least spotted station.


CQ-Contest mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>