[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted or multi op.?

To: Jimk8mr@aol.com, reflector cq-contest <CQ-Contest@Contesting.COM>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted or multi op.?
From: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Reply-to: n4zr@contesting.com
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 08:12:41 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I think I probably did - I wasn't serious in any case.  Maybe I'll 
submit as a check log to make the point that they need an Assisted category.

73, Pete N4ZR

The World Contest Station Database, updated daily atwww.conteststations.com
The Reverse Beacon Network athttp://reversebeacon.net, blog at 
spots at telnet.reversebeacon.net, port 7000

On 7/13/2010 7:37 AM, Jimk8mr@aol.com wrote:
> If you enter as Multi-Single, I hope you followed the ten minute on a 
> band rule.  And that's ten minutes on the same mode as well as same band.
> Off hand, I believe the ARRL contests where packet gets classed into 
> Multi-Single are single band contests where a 10 minute rule does not 
> exist.
> There really is a big no-man's land in IARU for packet users.
> 73  -  Jim  K8MR
> In a message dated 7/13/2010 7:04:00 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, 
> n4zr@contesting.com writes:
>     It's sort of funny the way the rule is worded - as if using spotting
>     assistance is shameful.  Several ARRL contests don't have a single-op
>     assisted category, but they classify single op + packet as
>     multi-single,
>     just as IARU does, but without the pejorative tone.  I'm entering as
>     multi-single.
>     73, Pete N4ZR
CQ-Contest mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>