[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] List of WRTC stations / Results /Overspottinganditsimpa

To: "CQ CONTEST" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] List of WRTC stations / Results /Overspottinganditsimpact
From: "Paul O'Kane" <pokane@ei5di.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 01:16:52 +0100
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>

> There was no impact, Rob.  LU5DX has decided to create
> a controversy where none exists,

No impact - where the number of spots for each team
varied from 1 to 121?  Of course there was an impact.
Look at the results.  A single additional spot for
ES5TV/ES2RR could have made them winners.  One fewer
spot for RW1AC/RA1AIP could have dropped them to
second place. 

Spotting is the most significant unregulated factor in
preventing WRTC being a true measure of the operating
skills of each team.

Can it be regulated?  If not, we will have the same
controversy next time.

Paul EI5DI

CQ-Contest mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>