If it is in the rules and omitted then they should be DQed.
On 11/9/2010 9:31 AM, Georgek5kg@aol.com wrote:
> There were a few smarty-pants ops who were omitting their callsign in the
> exchange. They were in violation of the rules, and should be disqualified!
> As the country song goes, they knew what they were a doin', but what were
> they a thinkin'?
>
> For them to omit their callsign was confusing, as it broke the rhythm of
> what I, and my logging software, was expecting to copy.
>
>
> 73, George, K5KG
>
>
>
> George Wagner, K5KG
> Sarasota, FL
>
>
> In a message dated 11/9/2010 6:12:03 A.M. Canada Central Standard Ti,
> n0nb@n0nb.us writes:
>
> Note well that "Your Callsign" is a *required part of the exchange* as
> stated in rule 4.3. Its ommission makes the exchange invalid, IMO. So
> it's redundant, that doesn't matter, it's *required*.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|