CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Frustration this weekend

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Frustration this weekend
From: Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 16:21:57 -0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
* On 2010 30 Nov 15:14 -0600, Ken McCormack wrote:
> Please tell me whether you believe that a QSO is valid if only one call sign
> is transmitted during a contest exchange.

I for one do not consider that a valid QSO.  If both stations do not 
have complete confidence of the identity of the station they are in 
communication with, how can a QSO possibly have been completed?  To do
otherwise relies on assumption (very bad) or borders on broadcasting on
the part of the running station.

73, de Nate N0NB >>

-- 

"The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all
possible worlds.  The pessimist fears this is true."

Ham radio, Linux, bikes, and more: http://n0nb.us/index.html
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>