[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Question

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Question
From: John Bastin <bastinj@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 09:40:14 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On Feb 18, 2011, at 02:46:38, Jukka Klemola wrote:

> Having the information spread in many papers is confusing for the
> newer contesters.
> If we want to try to attract newcomers, we should avoid rule unclarities.
> I hope Sean acts on this one.

On Feb 18, 2011, at 07:18:42, Jorge Diez - CX6VM wrote:

> could you please try to improve the rules, to have them in one file per
> contest. we will appreciate it very much.
> If something is common to many contest, today just with "cut" and "paste" is
> very quickly to write the same paragraphs in many files. 
> So if we want to read the ARRL DX rules, we just go to read the ARRL DX
> rules!... And this for each contest...


I strongly support this request. It would greatly reduce the problem with 
understanding the rules of ARRL contests, and lessen the confusion we've seen 
amply demonstrated here.


John K8AJS

CQ-Contest mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>