[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] More busted calls in RBN than human spots?

To: "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] More busted calls in RBN than human spots?
From: Henk Remijn PA5KT <pa5kt@remijn.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 15:26:27 +0100
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I did monitor RBN and the manual cluster through the full contest.

In the manual cluster I have seen myself spotted wrong 1 time.

In rbn I found 4 errors, 1x PA5T, 2x PA5K, 1x PA5KTE. No GA5KT, what I 
expected to see.
Pretty accurate.

Only concern is frequency accuracy. Some skimmers were too far off 
frequency to be catched by a station with a too small filter. (And there 
were  a lot of these this weekend)

73 Henk PA5KT

Op 21-02-2011 1:38, Barry schreef:
> Got my first taste of the RBN at K0RF this weekend.  Maybe K1TTT can do
> an analysis, but it seemed that the Skimmer missed lots of dits at the
> beginning of calls, as well as picking up stray letters.  My favorite
> call was that M/M from Argentina, LW3LPL :.)
> Barry W2UP

Henk Remijn PA5KT
email: pa5kt@remijn.net
www: www.pa5kt.com

CQ-Contest mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>