[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Comments on Proposed Changes to ARRL DX

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Comments on Proposed Changes to ARRL DX
From: "Christian Schneider" <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 09:47:31 +0200
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
AA3B wrote:
"There are significant stakeholders that have made major investments in time
and resources that are entitled to have a voice in this process."  
A voice = 1 voice (anyhow louder). I don´t want to be in the skin of
organizers who also have the interest to encourage serious contesting - with
serious defined as the seriousness of competetive engagement on all levels
to improve skills, knowledge and station regardless of financial investment.
More striking than in the clash of geografic regions about distance scoring
this constellation will be with the time topic. There is a vocal minority
defending the "48-hours-only"-Product regardless of the real
consumer/participant behaviour: The numbers buying it are comparable to
those buying cars with six-figures prices...

Flame suit on ;-)

73, Chris 

CQ-Contest mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>