CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R Skills and WRTC

To: "RT Clay" <rt_clay@bellsouth.net>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R Skills and WRTC
From: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@gmail.com>
Reply-to: Igor Sokolov <ua9cdc@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2011 10:08:47 +0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Just recalled: 
Amicus Plato sed magis amica veritas
73, Igor UA9CDC
__________________________________________________


For 50% of the operators at WRTC the only qualification needed is to be a 
friend of a team leader...no SO2R required :)

Tor
N4OGW

--- On Fri, 7/1/11, Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu> wrote:

> From: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] SO2R Skills and WRTC
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Date: Friday, July 1, 2011, 3:49 PM
> NQ6N wrote:
> 
>  > Nobody can deny that a SO2R takes great skill and so
> we
> respect ops who win this way.
> 
> Just an observation
> regarding SO2R and WRTC. IMHO SO2R
> skills have nothing to do with WRTC skills where each
> operator
> uses 1 radio on 1 band at a time. Yet most
> qualification contests
> are dominated by SO2R results since that's the best way to
> win
> multiband events.
> 
> Isn't this is
> analogous to having the qualifying heats for
> F1 racing based on NASCAR results? Doesn't make sense
> to me.
> 
> 
> 
> 73, Bill W4ZV 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>