[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Unintended Consequences

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Unintended Consequences
From: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 18:20:35 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I loved that first one.

It was going to be my fav DX test.


The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme

On 7/12/2011 7:55 AM, James Cain wrote:
> To Bob, KQ2M -- That was a great exposition on the CQ WPX rules; very 
> thoughtful. Thanks for writing it. It reminded me of why for a long time it 
> was a contest that did not interest me.
> I am still waiting for someone to reveal what the *un* intended consequences 
> were of increasing the WPX hours of operation from 30 to 36. I have no idea.
> I'm sure nobody remembers, or cares, but it was I who drafted the original 
> rules for the IARU Radiosport Championship (as we called it) in early 1977. 
> The Bicentennial Celebration in July 1976 had been such a huge success that 
> it seemed like a good idea for ARRL/IARU to sponsor an annual, big, summer 
> event.
> There were several active contesters at ARRL HQ at the time -- all of us in 
> our 20s -- and, as I recall, after the Bicentennial Celebration we all agreed 
> "that was very cool." And the Contest Advisory Committee in those days was 
> more active, and visible, than they are now.
> I don't recall when HQ multipliers were added to the IARU HF mix; it was 
> sometime after I was involved. I worked at ARRL HQ and was "contest editor" 
> and CAC liaison during the Bicentennial and IARU RS days.
> Jim Cain, K1TN/9
> Northern Wisconsin
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
CQ-Contest mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>