CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] KR2Q - RX1CQ

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] KR2Q - RX1CQ
From: Jukka Klemola <jpklemola@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 22:36:44 +0300
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
In RDXC there is the claimed and final result available.

Not details what and how was lost.


Could that be a compromise?

Some years ago when I did log checking for a SAC, I made up a
comparative figure of merit as penalties per total QSO amount. It gave
some spice to the perspective because the more one operates, the more
errors should occur.


73,
Jukka OH6LI


2011/8/9  <w5ov@w5ov.com>:
>
> Why shouldn't they be public document?
>
> Seriously!
>
> 73,
>
> Bob W5OV
>
>
>> Everyone here knows my opinion about open logs (I'm opposed).
>>
>> Now you want to see my UBN too?
>>
>> UBN is a private tool provided by the contest sponsor which enumerates
>> where
>> I screwed up in his contest.  It's a good tool which allows me to learn
>> from
>> my mistakes.
>>
>> Why should a list of my f*%*ups be a public document?
>>
>> Seriously?
>>
>> 73, de Hans, K0HB
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>