CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] WHAT'S THE POINT...OMG...did anybody actually read thep

To: <kr2q@optimum.net>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] WHAT'S THE POINT...OMG...did anybody actually read thepost?
From: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 14:27:52 -0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Would someone please direct me to the Amateur Radio contest forum?  I seem 
to be stuck in the Amateur Lawyer reflector.

Here's a rule for you, Doug.

"Everything not specifically prohibited is mandatory."

dit dit

Hans, K0HB



-----Original Message----- 
From: kr2q@optimum.net
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 2:36 AM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] WHAT'S THE POINT...OMG...did anybody actually read 
thepost?

I am dumbfounded.

The POINT (for me) is that the rules need to be CLEAR.

Currently, (for me and obviously for many others), they are NOT clear.

THE POINT IS...the rules need to be accurate, precise, and clear, especially 
with
consideration to non-native English speakers.

I don't CARE what the rules define, as long as they are CLEAR, WELL DEFINED, 
UNAMBIGUOUS,
EASILY UNDERSTOOD, and TRANSLATABLE.

The RULES (for all contests) must consider what is construed as "normal" 
across many
cultures.  Repeating my prior example, is 1500 watts output measured at the 
rig or at
the antenna?  That is not defined, but MUST be defined.  There are many such 
areas.

Hope everybody has a FUN time in the CQWW SSB contest, while always engaging 
in
FAIR PLAY.

de Doug KR2Q
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>