CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW impt notice: optional modification to cabrillo for

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW impt notice: optional modification to cabrillo format
From: rin JG1VGX <jg1vgx@jarl.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 13:11:54 +0900
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
How about defining the ratio of XQSOs to total QSOs to such as 2% or
5% in the rules?

This way inadvertent 'slips of the finger' XQSOs will be saved and not
penalized harshly but deliberate stretch of the rules cannot be
allowed.

rin JG1VGX


On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 3:16 AM, W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com> wrote:
> Wait................
>
> So a Multi/Single can break the rules and have their contacts removed
> yet the other station gets to keep the contact even though the station
> they worked violated the rules?  So what is to stop the mult station
> from running and just marking the non mults as zero pointers?
>
> This sounds like trouble waiting to happen especially with some folks
> who will stretch the rules to the max.
>
> Explain to me how the mult station ends up working non mults?
>
> Mike W0MU
>
> J6M CQ WW DX CW Contest 2011
> J6/W0MU November 21 - December 1 2011
> W0MU-1 CC Cluster w0mu.net
>
>
> On 11/8/2011 4:54 AM, kr2q@optimum.net wrote:
>> Hi...
>>
>> I just received an inquiry (as shown below) and I thought it was worth 
>> posting here too.
>>
>> "We were M/S and find that we worked some non-mults with the mult station. 
>>  What should we
>> do?"
>>
>> New this year for CQWW, you can now include a contact row in your cabrillo 
>> file that WILL NOT
>> COUNT.  This means the log checking will ignore this QSO for you, but will 
>> NOT ignore it for the
>> "other guy."  This way, YOUR log is clean AND the other guy does not get 
>> dinged.
>>
>> How?
>>
>> Edit your cabrillo output as follows:
>>
>> For ONLY the row (or rows) you want to be ignored, insert an "X" (no quotes" 
>> in front of the
>> "QSO" portion of the row (no spaces).
>>
>> So a row that originally look like this:
>> QSO:  7011 CW 2009-11-28 0000 KT3Y   599 5      YU1LA         599 15     1
>>
>> Should be modified to look like this:
>> XQSO:  7011 CW 2009-11-28 0000 KT3Y   599 5      YU1LA         599 15     0
>>
>> For M/S, also note that you should change the "Transmitter ID" (last column) 
>> from "1" to "0"
>>
>> For full details (video) of the entire CQWW 2011 update, go to:
>>
>> http://www.pvrc.org/webinar/cqww_2011.wmv
>>
>> And THANKS again to the PVRC for hosting this.
>>
>> de Doug KR2Q
>> no "usual" disclaimer
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>



-- 
73 de rin JG1VGX
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>