CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] unIDs

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] unIDs
From: "Edward Sawyer" <SawyerEd@earthlink.net>
Reply-to: sawyered@earthlink.net
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 21:19:31 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
The reason I believe it is acceptable to work them and not log them is
because if you run out of patience in waiting for them to sign, then you
honestly don't know what to log.  I believe its no different than the
exchange attempt as follows:

 

Me:  N1UR

You;  N1UR? 599 15

Me:  599 5

You: N1UR? CFM?

Me: N1UR

You (not hearing me):  NIL

 

In this instance example:

 

DX:  dit dit

Me: N1UR

DX  N1UR 599 33

Me: 599 5 CL?

DX:  dit dit

Me CL?

 

DX works 4 more stations without signing

 

Me: NIL

 

Tell me what's wrong with that.

 

Ed

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>