The W1 QSL bureau does not accept envelopes or stamps, just money (see
their web site). This works extremely well.
In addition, I have a good sorter, KV1J. I receive regular shipments and
enjoy sorting through the cards.
I am completely happy with the W1 bureau operation.
I still see a declining role for QSL bureaus, but will continue using them,
in and out.
In a message dated 3/28/2012 6:37:00 P.M. GMT Standard Time, email@example.com
I am a Bureau sorter in the 7th call area bureau. I thought I would
add some insight from the volunteers perspective.
Its not a huge time consumer to handle the cards but has many small
hassles that slow things down. A fairly large percentage do not use the
And some that do make things tougher for us. Some who receive lots of
cards will only provide a few SASE with 1 oz of postage. Others send lots of
money and envelopes but receive very few cards. In some cases almost none.
The current postage regulations make it very complicated to mail the small
packages. The basic envelope is easy. From there its more postage if
there is a metal clasp. Its more if its too stiff or thicker than 1/4 inch.
Also only so many can be stuffed into a 6x9 inch envelope. In some cases
larger users will use the flat rate boxes. Thats the most cost efficient but
unless they are getting hundreds of cards not too useful.
The possibility of also doing domestic cards was approached a few years
ago. Other than the fact it did not happen I do not know anything of the
To sum it up there is a lot of volunteer work to keep the ARRL Inbound
Personally I still like the paper QSLs but I do think LOTW should be used.
And there are some stations around the world that QSL for every contact
on each band and mode for every QSO. That adds quite a lot to the volume.
Personally I do not like that at all. Its one thing to confirm a 14Mhz QSO
on CW for some one but not for the many contest QSOs every year.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2012 12:43:15 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Is QSL Bureau pertinent in today HAM Radio
I Voted, and it looks lie i m in the majority also.
I'd love to see it opened to stateside QSL's also. he cost of sending
them now is far more costly than what DX cards cost to send when the
buro was made.
As they say the infrastructure is already there.
The Original Rolling Ball Clock
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest mailing list