I first tried to send my answer direct to your e-mail address but it has been
I answer you via the reflector, sorry for the bandwidth...
Well thanks for your patience and thanks for activating PJ4.
It was a new one for me and was one the highs on that evening.
Your signals were good with a loud 59+10dB from 13.00z to 16.30z when I left
the shack because the band (it was 15 meters) was closing.
If you need a sked drop me an e-mail. However I will be quite busy working in
april. May is much more quiet.
Yannick DEVOS - XV4Y
Le 30 mars 2012 à 03:01, John Laney a écrit :
>>> I remember reading Cebik's design articles on Moxon antennas where he
>>> pointed out their advantages (smaller size, wider bandwidth), but one of
>>> the things he noted was their strong degradation due to nearby metallic
>>> structures. The Moxon design is very dependent on tip-to-tip coupling
>>> of the elements and it doesn't take much to throw that off.
>>> Dave AB7E
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
> Yannick: Thanks for the QSO late in the contest last weekend with PJ4Z. I
> was the operator when you called on 20M. Hope to work you from my home soon.
> 73, John, K4BAI.
CQ-Contest mailing list