Yes, it think the responses need to be well thought out, and well written.
Also, my thought was that anyone or any club who is/has been active in any
type of emergency activity would be given more weight. So, maybe we do both
individual responses and club responses!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve London" <email@example.com>
To: "Paul" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Cc: "Sam Fry" <email@example.com>; "AOCC" <firstname.lastname@example.org>;
"AOCC" <email@example.com>; "CQ Contest" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 12:05
Subject: Re: [AOCC] FCC Seeks Comments on Impediments to
> On 04/03/2012 11:47 AM, Paul wrote:
>> This is a government bureaucracy.
>> Assume that a secretary opens the mail (or looks at email) and checks off
>> 'for' or 'against' columns on his/her form, numbers matter.
> For ? Against ?
> This is not a notice of rulemaking. It's a request for comments on a
> number of open-ended questions.
> Steve, N2IC
CQ-Contest mailing list