[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Control in Contests

To: "Ken Widelitz" <widelitz@gte.net>, "'David Gilbert'" <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Control in Contests
From: BP Veal <bryonveal@msn.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 21:41:28 -0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
If you telecommute to PEI, will you sign VY2TT or K6LA?  Or VY2TT/Tele 

73  Paul  N0AH

Bryon "Paul" Veal MAED
FCC Amateur Radio License - N0AH
ARRL Certified Volunteer Wireless Technology Instructor
-----Original Message----- 
From: Ken Widelitz
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 7:20 PM
To: 'BP Veal' ; 'David Gilbert' ; cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: RE: [CQ-Contest] Remote Control in Contests

"Where the RF emanates only makes conclusive sense on placing a station's
QTH for contests."


"we could clobber any W0 station in Colorado by operating a remote on the
east coast in most CQWW contests on most days with propagation."

Exactly, so what difference does it make to anybody if I fly to my station
in PEI, or telecommute?

I haven't remoted my PEI station yet, but I'm sure I'll do it in the future.

Jeez, if there are an additional handful of QSOs to be had, and better yet
multipliers, because someone telecommutes to their station vs. not operating
at all, that just makes the contest more fun for everybody.

73, Ken, K6LA / VY2TT

CQ-Contest mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>