[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Aniother rules/remote RX issue

To: CQ-Contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Aniother rules/remote RX issue
From: "Yannick DEVOS (XV4Y)" <yannick.devos@online.fr>
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 07:02:16 +0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Hi Bob,

Just read your message (I'm reading the diggest).
I fully agree with your views.
Even more, we don't have to put more words in the sentences. The more words you 
put, the more possibilities of interpretations you give.

Yannick DEVOS - XV4Y
> Where you draw the line is where it involves:
> 1) other operators
> 2) remote systems beyond the physical limits of the station
> 3) local hardware that replaces the operator in locating, decoding and
> identifying signals.
> None of that includes keyers, computer logging or anything else of the
> non-assistance ilk.
> No one is suggesting that anyone go back to paper logs.
> I am indeed baffled at how this is not crystal clear. It is clear to me,
> and apparently to many others.
> 73,
> Bob W5OV
CQ-Contest mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>