Why the eventual LoTW implementation should only be on the Yes (for
everybody) or No (also for everybody) basis?
What about an OPTION to load a contest log to both logs' adjudicators and to
LoTW in one go? Then let contest's participants decide what they want this
At this stage we can only build theories whether the contesting community
will accept this idea or not. Having two options and then some statistics,
one can make conclusions based on practice.
The moment the LoTW option is implemented, I'll be the first in the line to
[mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] От имени W0MU Mike Fatchett
Отправлено: June-06-12 11:11 AM
Тема: [Bulk] Re: [CQ-Contest] authentication for log submission
I think LOTW went a bit far. I don't need to jump through all those hoops
to trade stocks or check my bank accounts etc. Most browsers have security
built in with encryption. This could be used.
I wonder how many people refuse to use LOTW because of the difficulties
getting going? We certainly do not want to get to point where people will
not submit scores because a system is too difficult or restrictive to use.
W0MU-1 CC Cluster w0mu.net:23 or w0mu-1.dnsdynamic.com Http://www.w0mu.com
On 6/6/2012 5:18 AM, Yannick DEVOS (XV4Y) wrote:
> Dear Katsuhiro, Michael,
> Katsuhiro, you are right this is a serious security flaw in the way the
log submission are handled.
> It can lead to spoofing (someone use your identity to upload logs) and
flooding (trying to overload the server).
> However, as Michael stated, this issue is mitigated by the difficulty in
forging logs that could be really harmful to the whole contest integrity.
> A well designed server will also discard bad crafted logs without too much
> The only way to have a 100% secure system is the way LotW goes.
> However it is not easy to handle and will increase contest handling costs
> If I were a contest server administrator, what I will do is the following
> - for 95% of the participant, nothing at all just like today
> - optionally, participant who want to secure their log can request an
> "ID token" upon sending one hand written dated and signed scan of
> their license
> - an additional filed in the Carbrillo format will content this token
> and it will be checked while the log is processed
> This is not fully secured as someone can "sniff" the token on the network
(it is never crypted in the process) or hack the contestant computer and
> However if someone is serious enough to do this, this means all the
security on the server and the contestant computer has to be checked, and
this raises the bar significantly.
> For me, it add a fair level of authentication for a marginal managing cost
> Yannick DEVOS - XV4Y
>> I'm not sure this was discussed before, but this reminds me that
>> someone who has malicious intention may submit other station's log to
>> defeat the station after first submission by actual station.
>> There looks no authentication method to verify the station for major
>> contests(please correct me if I am wrong). Complicated method to
>> authenticate the station may lead decreasing the number of log
>> submission, so this may not be applied to all stations. But I think
>> there should be some method to authenticate at least for stations who
>> want to win a prize.
>> Please ignore this message if my concern is baseless fear, the
>> contest sponsors have already taken care of this, or we can trust
>> everybody since we all have good morals.
> CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest mailing list