[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] KP2MM Disqualified in ARRL CW 2012

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] KP2MM Disqualified in ARRL CW 2012
From: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 20:22:21 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
So in your opinion the "control operator" wasn't really an operator?  
Those pesky FCC regulations would seem to prefer that it be otherwise, 
and the ARRL rules also state that an operator must abide by the 
limitations of his own license unless a control operator contributes 
oversight..  You can't have it both ways.

In any case, your view or mine has little bearing.  The contest sponsor 
has clearly made his ruling.

Dave   AB7E

On 6/22/2012 9:52 AM, Paul Stoetzer wrote:
> Sure, but the rules state this as the definition of a single operator
> "One person performs all transmitting,
> receiving, and logging functions as well as equipment and antenna 
> adjustments."
> If Herb was merely present at the station to comply with FCC
> regulations and didn't do any of the above tasks, then it should be a
> valid Single Operator entry in my view.
> 73,
> Paul, N8HM
CQ-Contest mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>