[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL single op definition

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL single op definition
From: "Danny Pease" <dpease@adams.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 13:19:30 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Now you need the ARRL definition of control operator to actually be able to
make a decision.

My thinking about control operator is they are responsible for all
transmissions and radio adjustments, but I have not found that in black and
white in the contest rules anywhere.


Message: 2
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 12:35:28 +0000 (GMT)
From: kr2q@optimum.net
Subject: [CQ-Contest] ARRL single op definition
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Message-ID: <e516a5fe8f43.4fe85b10@optonline.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Simple...go to the source: the RULES

2.1.Single Operator: One person performs all transmitting, receiving, and
logging functions as well as equipment and antenna adjustments.

So...did KV4FZ (or any control op) do any transmitting, receiving, logging
or equipment/ant adjustments?  If all he did is turn the stuff on at the
beginning of the contest, I don't think the ARRL's definition of single op
was violated.


de Doug KR2Q

CQ-Contest mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>