They are. As is UN Headquarters.
It's silly that a building in Manhattan is a multiplier but the District
of Columbia is not. The fact is that the District of Columbia is the
only separate top-level political subdivision within the United States
or Canada that is not a multiplier in NAQP.
73,
Paul, N8HM
On 8/11/2012 10:16 AM, Aldewey@aol.com wrote:
> Correct me if I'm wrong but PR and VI ARE multipliers in NAQP. Right?
> What am I missing?
>
> 73,
>
> Al, K0AD
>
>
> In a message dated 8/11/2012 8:36:34 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
> wn3vaw@verizon.net writes:
>
> Otherwise, one could make a case for PR & VI, as populated US territories
> within the generally accepted bounds of North America, should also be
> mults.
> Is that what you want? Or would that be an unanticipated consequence?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|