CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Suggestions

To: Christian Schneider <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Suggestions
From: "Martin , LU5DX" <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 07:08:29 -0300
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Power abuse can be proved to some extent. Russian DX Contest committee have
already taken steps in that direction.
It goes without saying, packet abuse cannot be proved at all.

Vy 73.

Martin, LU5DX

On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 1:23 AM, Christian Schneider <
prickler.schneider@t-online.de> wrote:

> LU5DX wrote:
>
> Contest organizers, have in their hands a very specific and easy way to
> ensure more valid and transparent results are achieved for everyone in one
> very specific aspect where cheating has been hitting hard.
> As far as "your" category, it can no longer be effectively proved any more.
> ...
> Let's be generous enough and put the convenience of the whole over our
> personal likes and dislikes.
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Hmmmm, do you mean power categories?
> Let´s see: Validity can not be proved, cheating is hitting hard and of
> course there is more "convenience" with running the power you want
> regardless of category.
> Simply put: If you abolish an assisted category with the above arguments
> you
> MUST abolish power categories in the same second if you want to be serious.
>
> 73, Chris (DL8MBS)
>
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>