[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRRL SS Club Competition dilemma

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRRL SS Club Competition dilemma
From: barockteer@aol.com
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 12:00:59 -0500 (EST)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
What about:

8.5.3. Multioperator entries may (optional) utilize non-member operators 
licensed one year or less without including such operators in the 50% 
calculation. (The intent here is to encourage clubs to recruit contesters from 
newer amateurs without adversely affecting the club aggregate score.)

Does unlicensed equal licensed less than 1 year? I think this rule should be 
expanded to include operators under 18, and operators who have never operated 
in that particular contest before (newbies). I also think CQWW should adopt a 
similar rule - I submitted this to K3EST but I suspect it was below his noise 

-Tony, K1KP
CQ-Contest mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>