| To: | <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] SSB skimmer |
| From: | "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si> |
| Date: | Thu, 28 Feb 2013 21:17:41 +0100 |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
W3TX wrote: An SSB skimmer could be devised without speech decoding. Simply embedding a digital sub audible footprint within the SSB would do the job. Interesting concept on the first sight but hamradio does not use precise channel frequencies. Subaudible signal becomes loud outside of suppressed carrier zero beat. SSB bandwidth would be increased. I guess cost/benefit ratio is still positive. LP MMM S56A _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Moral of the story...really?, kr2q |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer accuracy..., Radio K0HB |
| Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Moral of the story...really?, kr2q |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] SSB skimmer, Jukka Klemola |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |