Perfectly said ..... Thanks John.
Scott/K7ZO
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Survey
From: K1AR@aol.com
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 17:05:38 -0400 (EDT)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
To members of the Bruised Egos & Assisted Sucks Club,
A few facts:
1) The distribution of the CQWW survey did not include a devious strategy
to exclude you. Randy used the WW email list from his received logs
database. Advice: Stop whining, get over yourself, take a breath and just
answer
the #$*&%% survey if it still bothers you. Many, many thousands have been
received so far. This channel feels like the Geritol Net at times. Any other
check-ins? Call now...
2) It is a major leap of faith to assume a rules decision has already been
made because someone asks a question in a single survey. After taking the
recommended breath above, please take another one.
W2LC mentioned that very few new contesters read this site. Frankly, I
don't blame them based on what I've been reading of late. It's just a
concept,
but how about posting some useful information about contesting -- maybe
just once in a while?
73, John, K1AR
Your friendly co-moderator
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|