They will be "held accountable" when people are willing to name calls in
these public complaints...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
> Steve Bookout
> Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 2:29 PM
> To: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com
> Cc: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX CW
>
> Hello all,
>
> As we know, sometimes 'stuff' happens when changing rcvr filters, RIT or
> changing antennas. These bad situations shouldn't really last longer
> than it takes to flip a switch or spin the dial. Sometimes neither
> station feels THEY should be the one to move. Like I said 'stuff'
> happens and this is contesting.
>
> This becomes a problem, WHEN THE SAME STATION, time after time, contest
> after contest, drops on top of you and starts CQ'ing.
>
> People, +\- 100 Hz is not a clear frequency!
>
> There are a couple of stations that are infamous for this. When will they
> be held accountable for their arrogance and poor operating ethics?
>
> 73 de Steve, NR4M
>
>
>
> On May 29, 2013, at 7:28, Cqtestk4xs@aol.com wrote:
>
> > My favorite is a certain zone 8 station that called me on my frequency
> > and then after he worked me, began to call CQ 100Hz away from my run
> > freq. It took a couple of minutes to pry him off me.
> >
> > Bill K4XS/KH7XS
> >
> >
> > In a message dated 5/29/2013 10:48:23 A.M. Coordinated Universal Tim,
> > g4odv@yahoo.co.uk writes:
> >
> > Hello Jesus,
> >
> > I am truly sorry to have caused you this concern, I should have said
> > that it was a remarkable coincidence that you landed on my qrg,
> > which did happen 3 or 4 times . I really should have put that in a
> > better way or preferably not mentioned it at all. Please accept my
> public apologies..
> >
> > 73 Bria
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: EC1KR Jesus <ec1kr@ec1kr.com>
> > To: g4odv@yahoo.co.uk
> > Sent: Tuesday, 28 May 2013, 17:24
> > Subject: WPX CW
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi Brian.
> >
> > Just read your comments at 3830scores about
> > us:
> >
> > -------------------------
> > On the other hand it was remarkable the number of times ED1R chose to
> > land on my qrg. He was weak and I am not saying he was hearing me but
> > I was hearing his callers who were busting up the esp numbers I was
> > trying to get..
> > --------------------------
> >
> > If we were weak there perhaps we did not hear you at all as you are
> > off the back or off the side of our beams. Also we set very narrow
> > filtering. Elementary it is not our intention to make delibetate QRM
> > and we always play within the contest rules. Nevertheless we
> > apologize for the trouble. Next time please do not hesitate to turn
> > your antenna and ask for QSY.
> >
> > We do not seek controversy, but understands that is a Contest with a
> > very bad propagation conditions where punishment not we heard each
> > other.
> >
> > A greeting.
> >
> > 73 de Jesus EC1KR / ED1R
> > Blog. www.ec1kr.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|