I am curious,
Has there been and studies comparing the error rates between the RBN
spots and "Human" made spots? There MUST be a human error rate out there
too. Who makes more errors?
Joe WB9SBD
Sig
The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com
On 7/19/2013 8:37 AM, Marijan Miletic, S56A wrote:
Rick, ZL2HAM wrote: My Skimmer often hears stations only once that aren't
heard by any other Skimmers.
We got several local CW Skimmers in small S5 but I preffer unfiltered richer
RBN spots. Poor summer condx and my temporary dipoles combined with FT1K
barefoot do not generate a lot of spots when I call short run CQ. However I
was amazed that ZL2HAM heard me twice with few dB S/N. This is significant
contribution to our main goal of studying radio propagations based on RBN
automatic reporting. Keep it uncensored - Hi.
LP MMM S56A
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|