CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Evolving scoring systems

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Evolving scoring systems
From: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 09:47:06 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Try this link...

http://ronandrachel.com/wp-content/gallery/blog-media/2011Sep01-Journal/Europe-US.png


Mike W0MU

On 12/3/2013 9:02 AM, David Levine wrote:
If the map at
http://ronandrachel.com/wp-content/gallery/blog-media/2011Sep01-Journal/Europe-US.pngis
accurate, and I saw many others similar to it online, then I can see a
marked difference in how EU vs US compares for point opportunities.

David - K2DSL



On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Jeff Clarke <ku8e@bellsouth.net> wrote:

How about zero points for W/VE – W/VE QSO’s and count US states and VE
provinces as multipliers. Also zero points for EU-EU QSO’s and count only
EU counties as multipliers. I mean really is a DL working a G really
working DX ? Isn’t all the EU stations working each other (mostly on the
low bands)  like domestic contest in the US anyway?  Too bad for all those
EU stations I gave up in frustration trying to work from PJ4A on 160 and 80
meters because they were happily working each other for one point QSO’s. I
probably would have been a multiplier for them...

Jeff KU8E

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>