There just aren't as many rtty skimmers as for cw. Wz7i near Philadelphia is
the best
of the ones here. There are several in Europe which will help whenever they
spot you.
The rtty skimmer technology is not as advanced as for cw, and it is harder to
do it well.
There is a digital only cluster described at
http://www.walter-dallmeier.de/software-by-dl4rck/rckskimmer/digital-cluster-system/
You can set options to only allow only rtty stations and only those that cq.
Most of the rtty skimmers are also fed into the RBN so you may already have
access
to spots there or from your favorite cluster.
If you want to see what it takes to run a rtty skimmer(actually called
Rckskimmer) take
a look at WZ7I's web page, especially:
http://wz7i.com/cw-skimmer/rtty-skimmer.html
Wes runs a dozen or more virtual receivers along with several conventional
receivers to
provide the coverage he does. I hope to run a 2 radio rtty skimmer for RU from
here in
Virginia but there are many gaps here in the US.
Additional Rckskimmer info is at
http://www.walter-dallmeier.de/software-by-dl4rck/rckskimmer/
I ran cqww rtty as assisted and found the spot volume was pretty good.
There is a real need for some rtty skimmers however.
Mark. N2QT
> On Dec 30, 2013, at 10:13 AM, wb0o@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> I see there is now an (A) class available to enter this weekend. What is the
> status of the US skimmers on RTTY? Will it be as fun as a CW (A) contest?
> 73, Bill KO7AA in Tucson (70 F and sunny in case anyone wants to know)
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|