CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened

To: Joe <nss@mwt.net>, "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened
From: Bob Kupps <n6bk@yahoo.com>
Reply-to: Bob Kupps <n6bk@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 21:41:11 -0800 (PST)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I vote for death.



On Thursday, January 30, 2014 8:03 AM, Joe <nss@mwt.net> wrote:
 
What is the penalty for the breaking of this rule.

Joe WB9SBD
Sig
The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com
On 1/29/2014 2:43 PM, Vladimir Sidarau wrote:
> Perhaps I just have not seen it before.
>
> Reading the CQ WPX Rules 2014:
>
> qt
> -- 
>
> XII. A. Unsportsmanlike Conduct: Examples of unsportsmanlike conduct 
> include, but are not limited to:
> ...
> 6. Running stations making more than 3 contacts without sending their 
> callsign.
>
> unqt
> ---
>
> Thanks to the CQ WPX Contest Commitee.
>
> 73,
>
> Vlad VE3IAE
>
> -- 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

>
>

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>