CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] An S&P'ers view regarding contest ID'ing

To: <CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
Subject: [CQ-Contest] An S&P'ers view regarding contest ID'ing
From: <n7jb@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 19:40:35 -0800
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I don't favor a contest rule requiring "frequent ID."  The contest station
primarily must follow the amateur service rules of his or her county - this
is the bottom line.  Not ID'ing frequently (selective ID'ing) is also a
contest strategy.  How will a frequent ID rule be enforced?  Will we
actually see someone disqualified from a contest for infrequent ID? How many
contesters are ever disqualified from a contest anyway?  I also wonder about
the contest rule that says "listening time counts as operating time."  How
is -that- rule enforced?  Doesn't it make more sense to start the clock when
someone logs his or her first QSO?  Just a thought.

 

If I don't hear a station identify frequently, I spin the dial to look for
someone who is actually ID'ing.  I think the competitive contesters who do
not identify frequently lose the S&P'ers like me (but that is
-their-strategy).  Even though I personally do not think a frequent ID rule
will work, it will be interesting to see if it does.  Thanks to all of you
out there who ID frequently during contests; this S&P'er really appreciates
it!

 

73,


Jim, N7JB

 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>