Hi Scott,
I concur with your findings. Digital folks really like eQSL, as do I. A
lot of folks seem to vehemently dislike it, but I like to see QSLs and save
my favorites into a folder and run it as a slide show when I'm not using
the computer otherwise. There are a lot of nice eQSLs, as well as too many
default ones.
That being said, I have complaints about eQSL, too. You just can't
satisify some people. ;-)) All this belies the fact that I'm a pretty happy
ham
radio camper. I'm still coasting down from an endorphin high from last
weekend's WPX-RTTY.
Online QSLing is a great step forward. You can see my general QSL
philosophy, as well as other meanderings, on my qrz.com page.
73,
Ken, AB1J
In a message dated 2/12/2014 00:12:15 GMT Standard Time,
cq_dx_de_aa0aa@yahoo.com writes:
I am about 47% confirmed on LoTW and much lower on eQSL (although not
calculated, country list is shorter). DX (outside NA) confirms more often on
LoTW, and, over all, digital QSOs are confirmed much more often on eQSL. NA
contacts confirm more often on LoTW or both. Digital contacts are
confirmed overwhelmingly on eQSL.
73, Scott AA0AA; XE1/AA0AA
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|