CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] The two/four-point rule in WPX

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>, <director@cqwpx.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] The two/four-point rule in WPX
From: Kim Östman <kim.ostman@tut.fi>
Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2014 21:04:21 +0300
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
To clarify, my two questions are related specifically to WPX. No need to
rehash the CQWW discussion. Sorry!

73
Kim


-----Original Message-----
From: Kim Östman [mailto:kim.ostman@tut.fi] 
Sent: 6. huhtikuuta 2014 15:10
To: 'cq-contest@contesting.com'; 'director@cqwpx.com'
Subject: The two/four-point rule in WPX

Hi,

The so-called "2-point rule" exception for intra-NA QSOs in CQWW was
discussed at length on the reflector in November 2013. Please see for
example
http://lists.contesting.com/pipermail/cq-contest/2013-November/104819.html
and the related discussion.

Many serious non-American operators see this exception as the contest
sponsor giving an unfair advantage to NA Caribbean stations, particularly as
compared to EU stations. The basic continental divide point system is flawed
too, but exceptions that favor a select group are certainly not an
appropriate solution.

It was recently brought to my attention that WPX also has a similar
exception, with 2 points for intra-NA QSOs on the high bands, 4 on the low
bands. 

Thus I would like to ask: What is the rationale for maintaining this
exception in modern times? Why does the contest sponsor disadvantage
European stations as compared to Caribbean stations in this manner?

73
Kim OH6KZP

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>