CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Cross-Entity Remote for Contesting and DXCC Now..

To: "Paul O'Kane" <pokane@ei5di.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Cross-Entity Remote for Contesting and DXCC Now..
From: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 13:34:51 -0800 (PST)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
The ARRL is a radio club in New England.  They have no responsibility for what 
means of communications any particular individual amateur engages in.  


Your are free to use whatever means suits your own personal fancy.  So is 
everyone else.




73, de Hans, K0HB

"Just a Boy and His Radio"™

On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 5:14 AM, Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com> wrote:

> On 22/01/2015 02:51, Gerry Hull wrote:
>> For those of you who are interested in cross-entity remote operation, it
>> will now count for
>> both contesting and DXCC,  for stations on both ends of the QSO.  The
>> transmitter country
>> will determine the entity for DXCC.
> The intent of the new rule is stated to be -
>    “It will continue to be up to the operator to decide what
>    types of legal remote control operating he/she will use
>    (if any) to contribute to an operating award,”
> It's clear this represents an abdication of responsibility
> by the ARRL.  Welcome to the brave new world of the American
> Internet Relay League.
> 73,
> Paul EI5DI
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>