Hi,
This is a very exciting news as it opens new way of financing DXpeditions.
Every DXpedition could bring it's own "time share" remote station located a few
meters from the operating positions.
"VIP Donators" could use it in a priority order given by the amount of their
donation.
This would ensure :
- QSOs on all bands for the biggest donators (even 160m is possible in daytime)
- Bigger donations as you want to be sure to have enough time to use the
"remote station" on all the needed bands.
73,
Yan.
---
Yannick DEVOS - XV4Y
http://xv4y.radioclub.asia/
http://varc.radioclub.asia/
> Le 23 janv. 2015 à 00:00, cq-contest-request@contesting.com a écrit :
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 07:29:58 -0600 (CST)
> From: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
> To: pokane@ei5di.com, cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Cross-Entity Remote for Contesting and DXCC
> Now..
> Message-ID:
> <33019364.307405.1421933398407.JavaMail.root@vznit170130.mailsrvcs.net>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> The Board voted based on the recommendation of the DXAC.
>
> The DXAC based their decision on input from the ARRL members. At least in
> theory.
>
> Of course, it would have been nice if the DXAC rep from each Division had at
> least made a token effort to gather input from the membership. All i can
> tell you is that I never heard a whisper regarding a request for input --
> neither as a Member or as a Newsletter Editor who would have printed such a
> request to inform people.
>
> Ultimately, though, it doesn't matter. Either YOU have integrity in how YOU
> operate in contests, chase DX, and apply for awards... or YOU don't.
>
> If YOU don't, your accomplishments are meaningless. If YOU do, then they are
> not. (And I mean "YOU" as in the reader, not in Paul or any one individual
> specifically)
>
> 73, ron w3wn
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|