Herb,
To clarify this point, you are being wrong by saying that Im a supporter of
that station. But by the way I think the "lipstick to the pig" reference is
a little too much.
Im just tired of being ashamed everytime someone asks me about the
"cheating going on in KP4" etc..
I feel I can do something about that creating an environment where this is
discussed and the problem might go away or the myth is busted. (some say
myth others say cheat)
If you have the right proof, you will do us all a favor and submit it to
who can make something out of it.
If they have it already, this conversation should be about the inability of
the committee to do anything even if they have proof, not technical
validity of our arguments.
In the absense of undeniable evidence we can only have conversations that
will promote finding a way to fix this or serve justice to the many QRP'ers
that are doing it right.
Felipe
NP4Z
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
As I said to you on a previous email..
Im not sure we are discussing the same thing. I think that if anyone wants
to debate validity of records and proofs of cheating should take it with
the proper channels.
We want to evaluate claims of super location/super antennas/low power in a
contest environment and see where it takes us,
either us operating or evaluating an operation from someone else. What
comes out of that and how is it going to be used is another matter.
This is More like a "local Pride" kind of thing.. Hopefully it will become
a reality.
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|