CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] I found my fav contest rules

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] I found my fav contest rules
From: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 22:42:12 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Those who designed the rules in the Stew Perry 160 meter contest are the real contest champions. In contrast the ARRL 160 meter contest, which penalizes operators in the U.S. Territories by lumping them in with W/VE, is a perfect example of unfairness. Imagine that every Pacific DX entity counts the same as Hawaii and the have KP2 counting as KP5 and KP2 counting the same as KP1. The fact that this is an obvious disparity has no impact on the chosen few inside HQ that refuse to change this. Once the ARRL gets into a rut on contest rules they refused to get out of it. Thier CAC is about as helpless as useless on a boar hog. They must be "tasked" by a select cabal of HQ insiders before they can even consider doing the right thing in correcting a well known problem. As a result stations in the U.S. Territories just refuse to participate.

Herb Schoenbohm, KV4FZ

On 5/25/2015 10:04 PM, Charles Harpole wrote:
Finally, I read the latest Stew Perry contest rules.

Stew Perry rules are now my absolute favorite..... stressing real ham radio
!   And scoring by distance!   Wow.

Now, if only there were other contests with distance scores!
Hey, Stew Perry guys, can I borrow your distance computation program to run
on my own logs on other contests.

Now to try to get on 160.  73, Charly


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>