CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] Fwd: WRTC 2018 qualifications

To: cq-contest@contesting.com, wrtc2018@lists.wrtc2018.de, 4o3a@t-com.me
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Fwd: WRTC 2018 qualifications
From: David Siddall <hhamwv@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 18:43:13 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Abbreviated version of email mistakenly not copied to relevant lists.

From: David Siddall <hhamwv@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, May 28, 2015 at 6:35 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC 2018 qualifications


The problem with MS & M2 is that the WRTC applicant may, or may not, be a
primary contributor to the score being counted.  For WRTC purposes the
score is NOT attributed based upon even a required minimum proportionate
share of QSOs made.

73,  Dave K3ZJ


On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 5:21 PM, VK4TS Trent Sampson <vk4ts@outlook.com>
wrote:

> Agreed Ranko,
>
> A scoring system that favours Single ops to compete in a Multi Op contest
> (WRTC) and disadvantages those who operate Multi Ops obviously has major
> flaws -
>
> Considering the format was  M2 from the last WRTC it is even further
> flawed.
>
>
> Regards
>
> Trent VK4TS
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>