I think it's human nature for SOME people to cheat. I'd guess it's not more
than 20%.
73, Zack W9SZ
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 2:43 AM, David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
wrote:
>
> I'm not in favor of inspectors, mostly because I don't think they are at
> all practical. But the problem isn't going to go away ... it's human
> nature to cheat. Seriously --- there have been lots of studies on the the
> topic of cheating and what variables make people more likely to cheat under
> what circumstances and Radiosport happens to have a majority of those
> factors. Out of pure curiosity I once did some casual research on the
> subject and even (per his request) sent a summary to Randy, K5ZD when he
> was doing a rules review some time ago.
>
> You can believe me or not, but I'm telling you that we're wired to cheat
> in competitive environments, or when something of perceived value (time,
> money, glory, gratification, etc) is at stake. I could give several
> everyday examples that would make almost all of us take pause. We simply
> are not inherently honest. Even our "morality" mostly boils down to
> learned and ingrained social pressures. Lots of hams seem to think that
> humans are fundamentally honest and that the urge to cheat is some sort of
> aberration. From an anthropological point of view, it's the other way
> around.
>
> There may be a way to come up with a contest format without cheating, but
> it won't be because people didn't try.
>
> 73,
> Dave AB7E
>
>
>
> On 8/21/2016 2:38 PM, Ron Notarius W3WN wrote:
>
>>
>> Solve the real problem, and the need for inspectors ought to go away.
>>
>> So how do you solve the real problem?
>>
>> 73, ron w3wn
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|