CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Exchange...

To: "ktfrog007@aol.com" <Ktfrog007@aol.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Exchange...
From: Dave Edmonds <dave@pkministrywebs.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2016 15:26:19 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I'm going to include my callsign in my exchange and I'll accept whatever I
receive....

TY

Dave AFP

On Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 3:12 PM, <Ktfrog007@aol.com> wrote:

> Since the rules say to send it, I think folks should.  I usually have the
> call as the first item filled in, then go back for the full exchange so
> when it's sent again it gives me a bit of a breather to help keep up and
> not fall behind.
>
> That's handy cuz I'm slow.
>
> However, I do consider the exchange to be valid if the call is omitted
> during the actual exchange.  The point is to have the call, however and in
> whatever order.
>
> 73,
> Ken, AB1J
>
> In a message dated 2016-11-05 6:03:45 P.M. Coordinated Universal Tim,
> dave@pkministrywebs.com writes:
>
> In my 2015 SS, many stations responded with "S/N, Prec, Ck, Sec" they
> didn't include their callsign in the exchange...
>
> Is this a valid report/exchange? Should I omit my callsign from the
> exchange?
>
> Thoughts?
>
> TY
> Dave WN4AFP​
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>


-- 
Dave Edmonds
PK Ministry Webs
864.288.6678
dave@pkministrywebs.com
www.pkministrywebs.com
"Webs from the Heart"
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>