Correct, no "M1" category. Packet will put you into M/2.
The collective NAQP team decided to keep that part of the rules the same as
it has always been.
Not all contest needs to be the same. Keeping NAQP more "traditional" keeps
it unique.
-Chris KL9A
On Dec 13, 2016 6:07 PM, "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com> wrote:
So you either operate SO no assistance or you get stuffed into a M2? There
is no M1? Why the bias against packet? So If I want to use packet and
chase mults all over I get dumped into a class where there are people using
two transmitters at the same time?
Explain to me how these changes or rules encourage people to get on? What
am I missing here?
W0MU
On 12/13/2016 1:55 PM, Chris Hurlbut wrote:
> The North American QSO Party rules have been revised!
>
> Current rules found here: http://ncjweb.com/NAQP-Rules.pdf
>
> Please take a moment to read them as there are some significant changes.
>
> Including, but not limited to:
> - Expanded multiplier list (Certain stations out east, rejoice!)
> - Off time rule clarification.
> - Output power clarification
> - M/2 classification clarification
> - Log entry deadline changed to 5 days
>
> Please pass this info along to any and all reflectors that may find it
> useful.
>
> Contest logging software authors, please update your NAQP multiplier lists
> where applicable.
>
> NAQP CW is January 14th, SSB is January 21st, and RTTY is February 25th!
> See you there!
>
> -Chris KL9A
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|