To: | "CQ-contest@contesting.com" <CQ-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [CQ-Contest] Dec 24 CQWW Blog: Trending SOABHP assisted entrants |
From: | Bill via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Reply-to: | ko7ss@yahoo.com |
Date: | Sun, 25 Dec 2016 06:10:11 +0000 (UTC) |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
So 65 % of CQCWWSSB NA entrants are unlimited. Hmmm.... More interesting will be the CQWWCW. With the firehose of CW RBN spots, more people have access to more contacts. More contacts is always more fun. The vast majority of W/K CW entrants have minmimal ability to "run" stations. The question then becomes, do you want to S&P the band yourself or click on spots with the occasional try at a CQ? The stats will answer which choice is more popular 73, Bill KO7SS _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Snarky comment re:Dec 24 CQWW Blog, Art Boyars |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Question regarding crank-up tower feedlines, Jim George |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Dec 24 CQWW Blog: Trending SOABHP assisted entrants, john |
Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] CQ 160 database - HELP WANTED, Randy Thompson K5ZD |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |