CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] DC in NAQP, WHY?

To: k9yc@arrl.net
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] DC in NAQP, WHY?
From: Jim Rhodes <jimk0xu@gmail.com>
Reply-to: jim@rhodesend.net
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 12:09:43 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
This did not happen overnight,  there have been requests from Eric and
others for a number of years. And their concerns were shared on this forum.
I guess HQ was finally convinced.

On Jan 10, 2017 1:03 PM, "Jim Brown" <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com> wrote:

> I have exactly the same question. Modern cities are a terrible place to
> try to do ham radio. I don't know of a single contest station within the
> city of San Francisco; AB9H and WO9S operate one of two contests from the
> city of Chicago. I lived and operated from a mixed residential/industrial
> neighborhood in Chicago, and my station was more modest than that of W3DQ.
> DC was a multiplier in RTTY RU, and it appears that W3DQ was the only DC
> station on the air.
>
> 73, Jim K9YC
>
> On Mon,1/9/2017 5:02 PM, Oliver Sweningsen wrote:
>
>> There was a decision on including DC as a multiplier for NAQP.  At who's
>> suggestion and, who made the decision to alter the rules?
>>
>>
>> There are many who would like to know, just why the change was made.
>>
>>
>> Who will benefit?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>