CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Multi 2 locking device, TriPlexers and BPF

To: k9yc@arrl.net
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Multi 2 locking device, TriPlexers and BPF
From: Steve Lott <lottsphoto@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 08:52:36 -0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
did I misinterpret that some were questioning K9YC's accreditation ?

I realize the 403A guys are on the other side of the pond

But gee how many contest ops do not know the accreditation of K9YC

Most of us sit up and take notice when K9YC has something to say
I know I do

I am biased to what I know and use which is
WX0B Eight Pak Two Radio antenna switch with SackLan
and the MK2R+ from MicroHam

I will say that ShackLan components lead a lot to be desired with their
Docuementation
of implementation and use of the components in an integrated system

Cheers!
steve
KG5VK



http://www.KG5VK.com
My Ham Radio Friends


On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 4:54 PM, Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
wrote:

> On Thu,1/12/2017 10:21 AM, Jozef Urban, OM7ZZ wrote:
>
>> We are manufacturer, and we have to grant claimed specifications to our
>> customers. And it is what we do. Do you have ANY lab certificate or
>> acreditation proving that your measurements should be more trustable than
>> our?
>>
>
> My qualifications are generally well known. At the time I requested the
> unit to measure, I had recently published a review of a half dozen band
> pass filter units. That review is still on my website.
>
> I was a potential customer. A sales opportunity was missed.
>
>
> 73, Jim K9YC
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>