CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] what is required of recevied audio, and whay

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] what is required of recevied audio, and whay
From: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Reply-to: n2ic@arrl.net
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 12:06:37 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I agree with Ed - it was a terrible decision to allow panadapters and waterfalls in the unassisted category. It was obvious to me that it wouldn't take long for bandmaps to be merged with these displays, making unassisted and assisted indistinguishable to the adjudicators, even with a recording. The law of unintended consequences.

73,
Steve, N2IC


On 03/09/2017 11:29 AM, Jim Brown wrote:
Hi Ed,

How did you feel when you bought your first memory keyer that could be
programmed for serial numbers?  Mine was an AEA, sometime in the '60s, I
think. Do you use programmable memories and dupe-checking with logging
software? Or are you still sending everything with a paddle, logging
with pencil and paper, and using a paper dupe sheet like we did in the
'50s?

73, Jim K9YC

On Thu,3/9/2017 9:49 AM, Ed Sawyer wrote:
This is why panadapters and waterfalls should never have been allowed
in the
unassisted category.  And why I have never used them.


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
.

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>