CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Prohibiting Interleaved CQs - killing Innovation

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Prohibiting Interleaved CQs - killing Innovation
From: Peter Lunn <bels@erols.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 11:42:55 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>

A comment that I understand and agree with.

I suspect there are lots of casual contesters out there, like me, who "participate" and make hundreds ( and sometimes many hundreds ) of QSOs in a contest without ( usually ) submitting logs. I rarely submit a log, but when I do, I look carefully at the rules. If I have not fully complied with the rules, I label mine a checklog.

73, peter, N4UP


On 3/17/2017 9:46 AM, Ed Sawyer wrote:
Lets be clear folks - we here and contest sponsors cannot and should not
start thinking we have any control of casual participants.  If a ZD7 wants
to come on and had out mult Qs, he or she should be encouraged to do so
under ANY conditions that generate activity.  Contests should be viewed as a
group of people agreeing to a set of rules and competition interfacing with
the general HF community willing and interested in participating.  The
participants are welcome - in all forms.  As long as they are not jamming
people and following their local country's rules, they should all be
welcome.

73

Ed  N1UR

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest



_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>