CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] "Transmitter" use rule

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] "Transmitter" use rule
From: Jack Haverty <k3fiv@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 14:35:15 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I've done the same.  But my point was to encourage the rulemakers to
include as a general contest goal the encouragement of new contesters,
and avoid making rules that become obstacles to that.

73,
/Jack de K3FIV

On 03/22/2017 06:39 PM, Art Boyars wrote:
> "I'd like to see this rule modified to be more amenable to bringing new
> ops into the fray."
> 
> I have a few times invited youngsters over to see contesting.  For Field
> Day I submitted as "group" entry, listing the names of the kids who made a
> QSO or two under my control.
> 
> While such recruiting is a fine thing to do, I don't think having to change
> to a Multi-op category would really matter.  If you are taking time to
> teach, you are not going to do so well in the Contest anyhow.  Be a
> Multi-op entry, feel like you've done something to help the sport.
> 
> 73, Art K3KU
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>