Ed,
That is what the thread started out as. A discussion about what was
observed and devolved from there.
This list is to discuss contesting right? I think that is what happened.
A point was made and then myself and a number of people said to contact
the appropriate ARRL folks and express your opinion which ever way you like.
I made a comment or two too many as did others. My apologies for that.
But I think the word got out and the reflector served its purpose.
W0MU
On 3/23/2017 6:48 AM, Ed Sawyer wrote:
I think that the strong opinions and emotion should be directed to getting
the rules changed, or not, by the contest sponsors. Not going after people
recognizing the rules and using them to their advantage. After all, the
very popular Multi-Single Category and the multi operators on the same band
in Multi-2 and Multi-Multi all started this same way. So did SO2R. All
very strict interpretations of the rules. Single transmitted signal on a
band at any one time.
The "transmitter" and "adjusting equipment and antennas" clauses in ARRL HF
contests can be equally reviewed. But until they are changed, they are the
rules.
If the particular sponsor (in this case the ARRL) considers the contest
rules important, they should have no problem considering this case.
73
Ed N1UR
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|